Kweku Baako Says 110 Ministers Is Too Much But….

Editor-in-Chief of the New Crusading Guide newspaper, Abdul Malik Kweku Baako Jnr, has admitted that the number of ministers appointed by the President is too much.

Speaking on Joy Fm’s Newsfile, Baako said although he agrees with the assessment that the number is on the high side, the action “is not a constitutional breach”.

President Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo named his deputy ministerial nominees this week, bringing the total of his appointed Ministers to 110 – a number that’s the highest ever in Ghanaian history.

The bloated number of appointees has sparked public outcry, especially after the NPP campaigned on cutting some of the excesses associated with the previous administration.

Baako, the veteran journalist, said he could understand the criticisms labelled at the President for the decision.

“I agree the number is big, I have done my own assessment, where I think we can do reduction here and there but I realise that even the reduction is marginal.

“For instance, – Information, – I cannot understand why we should have three [deputies] at Information…

“Energy -, surprisingly I’m for the three at Energy, you recall I was against the combination/collapsing of Petroleum and Power into one to make it energy. That’s a new area and a very expansive area so I was thinking they should have allowed it to remain separate, the President in his vision and the kind of programme, he has decided to put them together, I don’t have a problem with three deputy ministers going there, because of my own understanding of the new zones there, and the implications there.”

“Agriculture three -, I would have said ok and that is not unprecedented, we had three deputy ministers under Rawlings by 1999, but you see, there is a minister of state for Agriculture…I think the three, not the best.”

Speaking extensively on the issue, Baako added that he has in the past labeled such critics at Presidents, but in the end, there’s nothing they can really do.

“To be honest with you and I have to be very frank sometimes, prior to 2001, I was also of the view that the numbers were huge and I was part of those who were criticising the Rawlings administration for having those numbers, I remember Madam Hawa Yakubu led us in that crusade.

“Then, Mr Kufuor made a certain public confession and proceeded. Since 2001, I’ve come to the conclusion that, look,  it is not so much the numbers because you see at the end of the day, you can’t do anything about it if the president insist on keeping that number, you can’t do anything about it.

“The public are entitled to criticize, to lambast, to attack, to bring alternatives, especially the civil society groups, the governance groups, and they are doing it, and I’m happy with that. Indeed it is fantastic that you have all those groups coming up public and saying this is wrong, we disagree with it but that’s the end of it.

“If the president does not listen or hear and insists that this is the programme I have and this is how I’m going to execute the programme, bottom line, come election time, that’s where you exercise your veto,

“If it is a constitutional breach, if it is a legal breach, then there are avenues, even now, for him to proceed to cure the mischief, but if it is not a constitutional breach, it is not a legal breach, you can talk, you can criticize, if the president is so minded to agree, there can be changes reviews.”